Part of my brand-spanking-new Friday Folly about life as a researcher in the business world. Warning - these might ramble on a bit. I’ll try my best to keep them short but things might get a little crazy.
Researchers often fuss (or sweat) over the details. Like sampling errors, significance and scales. I’ve done it plenty of times over plenty of different projects.
I think part of why it happens is because we want our research to be really, really good. We also see it tied to our professional value or the value we offer to business. And we also do it because it’s drummed into us from the early days of research training and discussions.
After a few years of research as a young-whipper-snapper, I realized that not every one cares about these pesky little research details. A business manager doesn’t always want to know about the sampling error. A CEO doesn’t want the technical details about weighting … or scales … or screener questions.
Some might. A lot don’t.
As I redesigned our research portal earlier this week and started migration from the old to the new, I was thinking about all the different audiences I need to consider when distributing research. And I was reminded that catering to the audience is very important in promoting research use.
Read More